Family

  • March 20, 2026

    B.C. boosts compensation for intimate-image abuse victims

    British Columbia is increasing compensation limits for people who have had their intimate images shared without their consent. Victims can now seek as much as $75,000 in compensation through the Civil Resolution Tribunal (CRT) with amendments to the Intimate Images Protection Act now in effect.

  • March 20, 2026

    MARITAL OR FAMILY PROPERTY - Practice and procedure

    Appeal by the wife and the family company, 1225046 Ontario Inc. (122) from a partial determination of competing applications. The husband and the parties’ two adult sons asserted that 122 was incorporated in 1997 with the husband as sole shareholder and that in 2000 the wife and sons were each issued 1,000 common shares. The wife maintained that she and the husband had always been the only shareholders.

  • March 19, 2026

    The real issue behind parental alienation claims: A response to Gary Joseph

    Gary S. Joseph’s response to my opinion piece on Bill C-223 (“More on the politics of parental alienation”) describes my position as articulate. I appreciate the generous compliment. As someone who holds an MA in Advanced Language Skills, has a long career as a translator and speaks five languages fluently, I have had some practice.

  • March 18, 2026

    The mask of professionalism: Stress of maintaining the ‘good lawyer’ image

    In the first part of this two-part series (see link below), I wrote that in addition to actual legal work, most lawyers are also expected to act, speak and dress in certain ways. This added layer of effort can feel like a performance. It requires constantly monitoring yourself to maintain the image of a “good lawyer,” and it is exhausting. Here, I turn to what can be done to reduce the stress associated with all this extra labour.

  • March 18, 2026

    Distinct, complementary roles of section 3 counsel and litigation guardians in Ontario capacity proceedings

    When a party is incapable of instructing counsel, or their capacity is in question in a proceeding, two distinct safeguards exist under Ontario law to protect that party’s interests.

  • March 17, 2026

    SCC heard more cases in 2025 but still fewer than pre-pandemic; number expected to rise in 2026

    The Supreme Court of Canada heard more appeals last year than in 2024 and delivered its reserved judgments more quickly, but its hearings and output in 2025 were not yet up to pre-pandemic levels, according to the top court, which states it “expects to hear even more cases in 2026.”

  • March 16, 2026

    Family reunification: Understanding family class sponsorship applications

    At its core, Canadian immigration policy recognizes that relationships and family bonds should be prioritized and protected. Family reunification has long stood as one of the central pillars of Canada’s immigration framework, shaping both legislation and policy. A family class application is not simply an administrative process; it is an affirmation of commitment and an essential step towards a family building a future together in Canada.

  • March 13, 2026

    Malamas v. Wey: The impact of intimate partner violence on summary judgment motions

    In the recent decision of the Ontario Court of Appeal in Malamas v. Wey, 2026 ONCA 133, Chief Justice Michael Tulloch addresses how intimate partner violence impacts the application of the Limitations Act, 2002 and the doctrines of res judicata and abuse of process in the context of motions for summary judgment.

  • March 13, 2026

    More on the politics of parental alienation

    The recent article by Rina Groeneveld in Law360 Canada is an articulate summary of her position in support of Bill C-223, the Keeping Children Safe Act. Described by the writer as a “more nuanced” approach to the issue, my view is that, with significant respect, the article misses the point entirely. She writes from one vantage point, a former abused woman who provides support to other women who have shared her lived experience.

  • March 12, 2026

    Ontario Superior Court of Justice abolishes Zoom hearings for Toronto family law cases

    In a sweeping policy shift poised to dramatically increase the cost of separation and divorce for thousands of Toronto families, the Family Branch of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice has announced that, effective April 2, 2026, all family law motions at the Toronto courthouse will presumptively proceed in person — and no longer by Zoom.