In-House Counsel

  • May 28, 2026

    Online age controls for children: Can they work?

    Recent events such as the Tumbler Ridge shootings have brought to a head the issue of protecting children and youth online. However, the landscape for online harms protection for young people is at a crossroad. Increasing concerns are militating toward adoption of mandated age-control rules in online harms laws and social media bans. Yet in their current state of development, the methodologies for such controls present significant privacy and other societal risks, not only for young people, but potentially all internet users.

  • May 27, 2026

    Bill C-22 requires further amendments to ‘ensure privacy protections,’ commissioner says

    On May 26, Privacy Commissioner Philippe Dufresne appeared before the House of Commons Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security to discuss Bill C-22, the Lawful Access Act, 2026. While the commissioner noted that Bill C-22 “improves on its predecessor Bill C-2 in several respects,” he warned that further amendments are needed to “strengthen and ensure privacy protections for Canadians.”

  • May 27, 2026

    Lifting the veil on ‘the lift’: How CFEs and lawyers work together to expose hidden fraud

    In white-collar crime investigations, the most dangerous fraud often sounds the most ordinary. A property acquisition, a refinancing, a redemption, a distribution: on paper, these can look like routine business decisions, but they can just as easily be the perfect disguise for self‑dealing, concealment and misrepresentation.

  • May 26, 2026

    Court revives claim against Air Canada improperly struck as champertous

    The Ontario Divisional Court has reinstated an action against Air Canada over a delayed flight, ruling that the Small Claims Court erred in striking as champertous a claim brought by the purchaser of the airline tickets.

  • May 26, 2026

    Ana Badour returns to McCarthy Tétrault as a partner in Toronto

    Ana Badour has rejoined McCarthy Tétrault as a partner in its business law group in Toronto, the firm says.

  • May 26, 2026

    Court orders former OPSEU director to testify in wrongful dismissal case despite NDA

    The Superior Court of Justice, in Kachra v. OPSEU Pension Trust, 2026 ONSC 2092, delivers a pair of rulings for plaintiff-side executive employment lawyers in harassment matters: it makes it fair game during discovery to probe similar complaints from other employees, even if they do not involve their client, and it limits the use of NDAs as a shield to disclosure.

  • May 26, 2026

    Restituted art: Evolution of the legal framework

    During the Holocaust, Nazi Germany and its agents systematically looted approximately 20 per cent of Europe’s art, totalling an estimated 600,000 artworks. Although the restitution of these artworks and other cultural artifacts is very challenging work, the “legal framework” applicable has been evolving over the past few decades to the benefit of the families of despoiled victims.

  • May 22, 2026

    Presale deals in a declining market: B.C. Supreme Court clarifies when buyers can refuse to close

    In a softening real estate market, few disputes become as costly, as quickly, as a failed completion on a presale condominium purchase. In the recent decision in Rhythm Living Ltd. v. Pereira, 2026 BCSC 555, the B.C. Supreme Court confirmed that purchasers cannot readily walk away from a residential transaction simply because negotiated extras remain unfinished or new concerns emerge shortly before closing.

  • May 21, 2026

    N.L. picks lawyer to review privacy, access to information legislation

    Newfoundland and Labrador has tapped a veteran lawyer to conduct a review of the province’s privacy and access to information laws. It was announced May 20 that Keri-Lynn Power will commence a statutory review of Newfoundland and Labrador’s Access to Information and Protection of Privacy Act.

  • May 21, 2026

    Federal Court quashes $421,000 invoice threatening First Nation councillor’s election eligibility

    The Federal Court has quashed a $421,000 invoice issued to a First Nation councillor, ruling that the measure, which could have barred her from seeking re-election, was not properly authorized under the Nation’s governance laws.

Can't find the article you're looking for? Click here to search the In-House Counsel archive.