In-House Counsel

  • November 06, 2025

    Power at the door: Bouncers and the use of force

    Bars, lounges, nightclubs, et cetera are public stages for private enterprise; lively, necessary, sometimes combustible places where the safety of staff and patrons is paramount. At the door stands the bouncer: an individual whose presence reassures staff and is said to reassure customers as well. They enforce house rules and must, on occasion, confront disorder.

  • November 06, 2025

    Biometric identities and the invisible person: The fight for ‘facial privacy’ in Canada

    When you walk down a city street today, cameras are quietly watching, capturing and, in some cases, analyzing the smallest details of your face. This, in essence, is the new frontier of identity: the age of biometric recognition.

  • November 06, 2025

    Avoiding contract limbo: Lessons from Caivan v. Logoteta on termination and repudiation

    In commercial practice, broken deals are not always formally terminated. Under Canadian contract law, a contract in abeyance does not die on its own. Unless termination is clearly carried out, the agreement may remain in force, carrying all attendant obligations and risks.

  • November 05, 2025

    Manitoba introduces legislation to provide ‘business-friendly’ tax exemptions

    The Government of Manitoba has introduced legislation that will “enhance the province’s tax exemptions for investment, making them more competitive and business-friendly.”

  • November 05, 2025

    Alberta’s digital awakening: Reclaiming trust in the age of data, part two

    When Alberta ushered in its Access to Information Act (ATIA) and Protection of Privacy Act (POPA) on June 11, it wasn’t just swapping one set of bureaucratic tools for another. It was embarking on a quiet revolution; a statement that the province intends to govern not only with efficiency, but with empathy in an age where information is power.

  • November 05, 2025

    Arbitration appeals: Why ‘final’ might be the last word

    The principle of finality in arbitration is not merely aspirational. The Ontario Superior Court’s decision in 2501373 Ontario Inc. v. Selfe, 2025 ONSC 5216 confirms that, in Ontario, using the phrase “final and binding” in an arbitration clause may foreclose appellate review, even on questions of law. Where appeals are available on legal questions but leave is required, the would-be appellant must identify an extricable question of law — and courts do not readily extract legal issues from arbitral findings.

  • November 05, 2025

    Regulatory bodies should keep to their lane

    Regulatory bodies exist to serve the public interest by enforcing laws, upholding professional standards and ensuring fair processes within the sectors they oversee. Their legitimacy rests not on popularity or political influence but on trust, neutrality and the perception of impartiality. When regulators take public positions on political issues, they risk undermining these foundations.

  • November 05, 2025

    Canada’s 2026-2028 Immigration Levels Plan: Sharp temporary cuts, permanent stability

    This article has been updated by removing irrelevant information. 

  • November 04, 2025

    P.E.I. unveils five-year $1.6B capital plan for hospitals, schools and housing

    The government of Prince Edward Island has unveiled plans for $1.6 billion in infrastructure investments in its 2026-27 capital budget presented to the province’s legislative assembly on Nov. 4.

  • November 04, 2025

    Brain fog and other long COVID problems in the workplace

    The pandemic may not be on many people’s radars these days, but those with long COVID continue to struggle with a serious illness that is often misdiagnosed, frequently dismissed and not fully understood.

Can't find the article you're looking for? Click here to search the In-House Counsel archive.