Personal Injury

  • August 29, 2025

    ‘Right to be forgotten’ privacy issues under PIPEDA and Charter heading to Federal Court

    Does Parliament’s private-sector privacy law protect the “right to be forgotten”? That question, at least in part, is now headed to Federal Court, following a groundbreaking determination this week by Canada’s privacy commissioner that Canadians have a right under the federal Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA) — in some circumstances and when certain criteria are met — to have online material about them delinked from their names (“de-listed”) so that published material is not listed in search engine results when their name is searched.

  • August 29, 2025

    Karyn Jemmott joins McCague Borlack

    McCague Borlack LLP has announced that Karyn Jemmott has joined its Toronto office as a law clerk.

  • August 28, 2025

    Canada amends vessel operation regulations for more local management

    The federal government is amending the Vessel Operation Restriction Regulations so local authorities can more efficiently manage issues such as excessive speed, shoreline erosion and community safety concerns.

  • August 27, 2025

    Law Foundation of Ontario celebrates 50 years in 2024 annual report

    The Law Foundation of Ontario is marking its golden anniversary as part of its annual report for 2024. Last year marked the Law Foundation of Ontario’s 50th anniversary — making that year’s report a milestone paper in the life of the organization. In their joint introductory message, chair Linda Rothstein and CEO Lisa Cirillo stated that 2024 represented the organization’s “largest single granting year.”

  • August 27, 2025

    Bayer agrees to $9M settlement in class action over birth control side effects

    Pharmaceutical giant Bayer has agreed to pay $9.05 million to settle a class actions concerning allegations that two of its oral contraceptive products cause blood clots and gallbladder disease.

  • August 26, 2025

    Reasonably late? Ontario court clarifies investigative duties in priority disputes

    In Intact Insurance Company v. Aviva Insurance Company of Canada, Court File No. CV-22-00690361-0000 (May 7, 2025), the Ontario Superior Court of Justice upheld an arbitration decision allowing Aviva to pursue its priority dispute against Intact despite serving its Notice of Dispute nearly three years after the 90-day deadline had passed.

  • August 26, 2025

    Otsuka, Lundbeck agree to settle antipsychotic drug class action for $4.75M

    Pharmaceutical companies Otsuka Canada and Lundbeck Canada have agreed to a proposed $4.75-million settlement in a class action alleging that their antipsychotic drug Rexulti may cause compulsive behaviours, including hypersexuality, compulsive gambling and binge eating.

  • August 21, 2025

    ‘Inadequate’ pay deters outstanding jurists from federal bench; $28,000 boost needed: commission

    Canada’s 1,198 federally appointed judges should get a substantial lump sum salary increase — $28,000 — as their pay package is no longer enough to attract “outstanding” private bar lawyers to the bench, says the federal Judicial Compensation and Benefits Commission, echoing warnings made by federal judicial leaders over the past few years.

  • August 14, 2025

    DEI dilemma: U.S. state bars grapple with DEI programs, language amid legal threats

    State bar leaders across the U.S. are wrestling with whether to stand firm on their diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) programs or quietly rework programs and language as they face rising political pressure and potential legal challenges.

  • August 14, 2025

    Bar ramps up campaign to end ‘Zoom-only’ policy & get intervener counsel back into SCC’s courtroom

    Prominent intervener groups are telling the Supreme Court of Canada that its 2022 practice direction confining their counsel to Zoom and barring intervener lawyers from making submissions in person before the judges is hurting their advocacy and restricting access to justice for public interest groups. However, the top court says it’s sticking with its current policy since “virtual appearances have proven to be an effective means of supporting equal access.”