In-House Counsel

  • June 22, 2026

    Competition Bureau obtains court order for investigation into Sobeys’ property controls

    On June 22, the Competition Bureau announced it has obtained “court orders to advance its investigation into Empire Company Limited’s use of property controls in Canada.”

  • June 22, 2026

    U.S.-Iran memorandum of understanding: Authority, binding nature, implications for Iranians

    The Islamabad memorandum of understanding (MOU), signed on or about June 17, 2026, between the United States and the Islamic Republic of Iran (with Pakistan as mediator/witness), marks a temporary ceasefire following months of conflict. Titled the “Islamabad Memorandum of Understanding between the United States of America and the Islamic Republic of Iran,” the 14-point document creates an extendable 60-day negotiating period for a final comprehensive agreement. The full text is attached as Exhibit A below.

  • June 22, 2026

    Manitoba King’s Bench Chief Justice Glenn Joyal nominated for Supreme Court western vacancy

    Manitoba Court of King’s Bench Chief Justice Glenn Joyal, widely reputed in recent years to be a leading candidate for appointment to the Supreme Court of Canada, has been nominated to fill the western vacancy that opened up with the May 30 retirement of Supreme Court of Canada Justice Sheilah Martin, Prime Minister Mark Carney announced on June 22.

  • June 19, 2026

    Ontario retains jurisdiction over claims against offshore trustee: court

    The Ontario Court of Appeal has upheld a finding that Ontario courts have jurisdiction over claims against a Liechtenstein trustee whose offshore trust was allegedly funded with money siphoned from Bridging Finance, rejecting arguments that the trustee was too remote from the alleged misconduct.

  • June 19, 2026

    OPC’s Grok deepfake investigation points to the need for privacy and online harms reform

    In an investigation report released on June 11, the federal Office of the Privacy Commissioner (OPC) found that the AI chatbot Grok, a feature offered to users of X, the social media platform (formerly Twitter), breached the current privacy law, the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA), by creating sexualized artificial images of real people, in particular women and children, without their consent.

  • June 18, 2026

    E-scooter an ‘automobile’ under Insurance Act: Alberta Court

    The Alberta Court of King’s Bench has ruled that an electric scooter qualifies as an “automobile” under the province’s Insurance Act, excluding a rider injured in a collision with a minivan from accident benefits under the vehicle’s insurance policy.

  • June 18, 2026

    Ontario Court of Appeal overturns Handley Estate rule: Disclosure of partial settlements

    In multi-party civil litigation, it is common for one or more parties to resolve their disputes by way of agreement, while the proceeding continues against those parties who have not settled. These “partial settlement agreements” are a routine feature of complex litigation.

  • June 18, 2026

    New International Chamber of Commerce arbitration rules

    The International Chamber of Commerce’s (ICC) 2026 Arbitration Rules, which came into effect on June 1, 2026, mark a decisive shift in how ICC cases will be managed and resolved in the future.

  • June 18, 2026

    Emerging judicial divide in Canadian employment law: Employee protection vs. contractual certainty

    Canadian employment law has long attempted to balance two competing objectives. On one hand lies the protection of employees, who are generally regarded as the more vulnerable party in the employment relationship. On the other lies the principle of contractual certainty, which permits employers and employees to define their rights and obligations through freely negotiated agreements.

  • June 17, 2026

    Unjust enrichment claim not a life preserver for a poorly drafted contract

    The Ontario Court of Appeal’s decision in Wallbridge, Wallbridge v. Poupore, 2026 ONCA 417 is a useful reminder that courts do not rescue parties from incomplete compensation arrangements simply because the result may seem unfair.