Law360 Canada

SECTIONS
Business
Pulse
Access to Justice
Labour & Employment
Wills, Trusts & Estates
Family
Criminal
Civil Litigation
Personal Injury
In-House Counsel
Insurance
Intellectual Property
Immigration
Natural Resources
Real Estate
Tax
ABOUT Law360 CANADA
About us
Explore Law360 Canada
Contact us
Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Subscribe
My Account

Sections

The Supreme Court has ruled 9-0 that a complainant’s “sexual inactivity” is presumptively inadmissible “sexual history” and that the common law voir dire regime for screening Crown led sexual history evidence should mirror the basic Criminal Code process that governs defence-led sexual history evidence. MORE TO COME.

Register for a complimentary 14-day trial with access to all sections and newsletters.

Email (NOTE: Free email domains not supported)

First Name

Last Name

Job Title

Postal code*

PLEASE NOTE: A verification email will be sent to your address before you can access your trial.

Password (at least 8 characters required)

Confirm Password

Phone Number (###-###-####)

Select at least one primary interest:

Access to Justice

Business

Civil Litigation

Criminal

Family

Immigration

In-House Counsel

Insurance

Intellectual Property

Labour & Employment

Natural Resources

Personal Injury

Pulse

Real Estate

Tax

The Complete Brief

Wills, Trusts & Estates

Law360 Canada may contact you in your professional capacity with information about our other products, services and events that we believe may be of interest.

You’ll be able to update your communication preferences via the unsubscribe link provided within our communications.

We take your privacy seriously. Please see our Privacy Policy.

Start Reading

Already have access?

Email:
Password: Forgot your password?
Remember login
Sign In