- SECTIONS
- Business
- Pulse
- Access to Justice
- Labour & Employment
- Wills, Trusts & Estates
- Family
- Criminal
- Civil Litigation
- Personal Injury
- In-House Counsel
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Immigration
- Natural Resources
- Real Estate
- Tax
- ABOUT Law360 CANADA
- About us
- Explore Law360 Canada
- Contact us
- Privacy Policy
- Terms & Conditions
- Subscribe
- My Account
Sections
					
					
				Dividing over what qualified as a “reasonable hypothetical” in a s. 12 Charter challenge, the Supreme Court of Canada affirmed 5-4 that the 1-year mandatory minimum penalties for accessing or possessing child pornography are unconstitutional as they are grossly disproportionate and cruel & unusual punishment when applied in some circumstances. MORE TO COME.