Law360 Canada ( October 10, 2017, 8:45 AM EDT) -- Appeal by the accused, Guillemin, from a conviction for impaired driving. The accused was the driver in a single vehicle accident in the early morning hours. His vehicle left the road and slid down an embankment. A nearby witness to the accident called 911 and saw the accused climb up the embankment to waiting police. The witness did not notice anything unusual about the accused's manner of walking or speech. The attending officer testified that paramedics assisted the accused to the ambulance. The officer noted the accused's unsteady balance, bloodshot eyes, blank look, and slightly slurred speech. The officer could smell alcohol emitting from the accused while he was tended to by paramedics. The accused denied drinking. A charge of driving with a blood alcohol level over .08 was stayed following a voir dire, and the voir dire evidence was admitted to trial on the impaired charge. The accused was convicted. He appealed on the basis the trial judge relied on inadmissible evidence of his impairment contrary to the limited use doctrine....