- SECTIONS
- Business
- Pulse
- Access to Justice
- Labour & Employment
- Wills, Trusts & Estates
- Family
- Criminal
- Civil Litigation
- Personal Injury
- In-House Counsel
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Immigration
- Natural Resources
- Real Estate
- Tax
- ABOUT Law360 CANADA
- About us
- Explore Law360 Canada
- Contact us
- Privacy Policy
- Terms & Conditions
- Subscribe
- My Account
Sections
The Supreme Court of Canada has interpreted the meaning of Criminal Code ss. 495(2) and (3), ruling 9-0 that a voir dire was wrongly denied to the accused who sought to challenge the legality of his warrantless arrest on a sexual assault charge: R. v. Carignan. MORE TO COME.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Related Sections
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT