Law360 Canada ( April 22, 2022, 6:29 AM EDT) -- Appeal by Stojanovski brothers (“Appellants”) from their conviction and sentence imposed for attempted murder on the grounds that the trial judge’s instruction about aiding was deficient, and she erred in her approach to the Crown’s alternative theory. The Appellants met Nassundu to purchase marijuana. The meeting resulted in Nassundu being shot in the parking lot. The Appellants were charged with attempted murder and discharge of a firearm with the intent to endanger life. The Crown’s primary theory of liability was that the Appellants shot Nassundu, and its alternative theory was one of the Appellants aided the other to shoot Nassundu. A jury found each of the Appellants guilty on both charges. The sentencing judge held the shooting in a populated public place, which jeopardized the lives of others and resulted in Nassundu being confined to a wheelchair with no use of his legs, justified a sentence of 18 years for each appellant. The appellants submitted the sentencing judge erred in her analysis of the aggravating factors and failed to address the rehabilitative potential of both appellants....