Law360 Canada ( June 7, 2022, 6:40 AM EDT) -- Appeal by Moe and Moe-Villa Investments Ltd. from the chambers judge’s decision which authorized Morrison to file a caveat on the Glenora Crescent property (“property”) on the grounds that the title of the property was in the name of a third party. Morrison and Moe were married. The property in question was purchased by Moe’s parents, and the parties started residing in it at that time. Moe’s parents transferred the property to her. The property was the matrimonial residence during the marriage. Moe transferred the property to her mother. Morrison consented to the transfer by releasing his dower interest. Moe’s mother later transferred the title to herself and her husband, Moe’s father, as joint tenants. Moe’s mother died shortly thereafter, and Moe’s father became the sole owner by survivorship. The parties separated. Post-separation, the property was registered in the name of Moe’s father, and Moe continued to reside in it. There was a property on St. George’s Crescent owned by Moe’s parents’ corporation. Morrison filed a lis pendens and gave notice that he claimed an interest in the St. George’s Crescent property. The corporation brought an application to discharge the lis pendens. The chambers judge allowed Morrison to file a caveat on the property. The chambers judge declared the lis pendens was improperly filed on the title to the St. George’s Crescent property. Moe never had any interest in that property, and it was clearly never transferred within one year prior to the commencement of the matrimonial property proceedings....