Law360 Canada ( July 18, 2025, 12:01 PM EDT) -- Appeal by Boldt (Appellant) from the Court of King’s Bench’s decision dismissing his application for an order requiring the respondent Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) to disclose documents associated with activity from certain internet protocol (IP) addresses. The appellant’s claim originated from a defamatory Instagram post published by anonymous individuals under the account “victimsvoicesregina,” alleging sexual harassment by the appellant. To identify the individuals behind the post, Boldt sought disclosure of identifying documents from the respondents which were associated with the IP addresses used to access the Instagram account. He argued that the chambers judge erred in dismissing his application by failing to consider material evidence and misapprehending the nature of the disclosure sought. He contended that the documents were not protected by solicitor-client privilege and should be disclosed under Rule 5-15 of the King’s Bench Rules or through a Norwich application. SaskTel opposed the application, asserting that the documents were privileged as they were held in its legal department and that the appellant had not established their relevance to his claim....