Law360 Canada ( June 2, 2026, 9:53 AM EDT) -- Appeal by Sandhu from a decision declaring him a vexatious litigant and dismissing his remaining action against the College of Immigration and Citizenship Consultants (College). Sandhu and his brother, former licensed immigration consultants, had their licences revoked following disciplinary findings of professional misconduct. Over more than two years, and continuing after revocation, Sandhu initiated numerous proceedings and motions challenging the authenticity of the College’s evidence, including multiple unsuccessful motions before the Discipline Committee, actions and judicial review applications in the Federal Court, and further applications against the College, the RCMP, and the Attorney General of Canada. Many were dismissed or discontinued. The Federal Court found a persistent pattern of relitigation, repeated and scandalous allegations of forgery and fraud raised in irrelevant contexts, and disregard of court orders and rules, and concluded these hallmarks justified regulating Sandhu’s access to the Court. It also dismissed his remaining action as lacking merit. On appeal, Sandhu argued the Federal Court misapplied the vexatious litigant test by focusing on the number rather than the merits of proceedings, erred by dismissing his action without considering its merits, breached procedural fairness by failing to rule on his motion to admit a Privacy Commissioner letter concerning the Attorney General’s consent to the application, and undermined judicial integrity by making prejudicial comments affecting his ongoing judicial review of the discipline decision. The issues were whether the Federal Court committed legal error or a palpable and overriding error in making the vexatious litigant order, dismissing the action, or addressing procedural fairness and bias concerns....