Law360 Canada ( August 12, 2026, 8:21 AM EDT) -- Appeal by appellants from an order granting an oppression remedy under s. 227 of the Business Corporations Act. The chambers judge ordered the appellant, MAJ Enterprises Inc. to purchase the respondent’s shares, with the price to be determined by a chartered business valuator retained and instructed by a receiver, without requiring court approval of the valuation. The appellants argued that the chambers judge erred in delegating the determination of share value to a valuator and should have retained authority to determine fair value after a further evidentiary hearing. They submitted that the order unfairly bound them to a future valuation with no ability to challenge or appeal it. The respondent argued that the appellants consented to a buyout based on a valuation by a valuator and were raising a new issue on appeal and further maintained that the chambers judge properly exercised broad discretion to craft an equitable remedy and that the appointment of a receiver ensured fairness. The issues were whether the appellants could raise the issue on appeal and whether the chambers judge erred in delegating the valuation without retaining a judicial role....