Law360 Canada ( October 13, 2026, 9:41 AM EDT) -- Appeal by Harjit from orders dismissing his civil claim and cancelling a certificate of pending litigation against his late father Swinder’s residential property. Harjit challenged Swinder’s addition of his grandchildren to a joint bank account, the transfer of his home to grandchildren Monica and Soliman, and his 2013 and 2020 wills, having alleged incapacity and undue influence. He also sought removal of Rani as executor and alleged that a solicitor, Rai, and his firm negligently failed to assess Swinder’s capacity and undue influence. Swinder was estranged from Harjit and repeatedly expressed his intention to benefit his grandchildren and exclude his children. Rai and Swinder’s friends and family described Swinder as competent and acting independently when making the transfers and wills. Harjit argued that the summary trial was procedurally unfair because he lacked sufficient opportunity to inspect medical records and test credibility, that a medical record referring to delirium supported incapacity, that Chelsea exercised undue influence, that badges of fraud applied to the transfers, and that Rai owed him a duty of care. The issues were whether the summary trial process was unfair and whether the judge erred in dismissing Harjit’s substantive claims....