Law360 Canada ( November 14, 2025, 11:03 AM EST) -- Appeal by appellant convicted of criminal harassment of three individuals who were all members of the same family. The appellant was sentenced to a 90-day intermittent period of incarceration which he had fully served. The charges arose as a result of the appellant believing that the complainants caused damage to his oyster lease which was located close to a new residential structure in MacMillan Point which was surrounded by a body of water known as Brackley Bay. The complainants were Jason Brasseur (Brasseur) and his wife Cheryl Cusack (Cusack) along with their son Samson Brasseur. Cusack and Brasseur began to develop property on MacMillan Point Road. The appellant made a number of complaints concerning the development and building taking place on the lot. The trial judge noted that as a result of a severe rainstorm, the appellant arrived at the Cusack/Brasseur property and dumped dead oysters at the end of the driveway. The appellant was upset and yelled and cursed throughout much of the interaction. The appellant accused Brasseur of being responsible for the damage suffered in his adjacent oyster lease and that Brasseur acted deliberately. The appellant argued that his actions were not criminal, relied upon the defence of property and argued that the trial judge erred in several ways. The appellant argued that defence counsel was permitted to question a Crown witness, to disregard issues of corporate personality and ask questions that related to corporate criminal convictions and the facts underpinning the conviction....