Pulse
-
February 02, 2026
Access to Justice Week B.C. speaks to importance of system that evolves, listens and learns, AG says
British Columbia Attorney General Niki Sharma is marking Access to Justice Week by reaffirming the province’s commitment to building a justice system that is “responsive, inclusive and accessible.”
-
February 02, 2026
Court of Quebec appoints new judge and justice of the peace magistrate
Quebec Minister of Justice Simon Jolin-Barrette has announced the appointment of a judge and a justice of the peace magistrate to the Court of Quebec.
-
February 02, 2026
Ontario appoints 4 new judges to Court of Justice
Ontario has appointed four new judges to the Ontario Court of Justice, effective Jan. 29: Justice Joanne Michelle Marie Clouston, Justice Archana Arun Medhekar, Justice Jesse M. Razaqpur and Justice Mary Meta Elizabeth Warren.
-
February 02, 2026
The recent incident at the courthouse in Oshawa
Have you seen the documentary on Netflix called Skyscraper Live? It documents an unbelievable solo climb up a 100-storey building in Taiwan. The climber had no rope, no parachute and no safety harness. Any slip on his part, any grip not secure, and he falls to his death. Writing this article, I feel like that climber, only I am about to fall off the building … but … here goes.
-
January 30, 2026
SCC gives guidance on interpreting insurance contracts, interplay of endorsements & exclusions
Elaborating on how to interpret insurance contracts, the Supreme Court of Canada dismissed 7-2 the appeal of two homeowners who sought to compel their insurer to fully pay for rebuilding their flood-destroyed house, despite an exclusion for “compliance costs” and the ancillary exception that caps the compliance costs payout at $10,000 “for the increased cost of demolition, construction, or repair to comply with any law regulating the zoning, demolition, repair or construction of any insured buildings.”
-
January 30, 2026
Is international law really law or just a script the powerful edit at will?
International law likes to enter the room wearing a tailored suit, speaking in solemn tones about order, peace and a rules-based world. It carries binders full of treaties, conventions, charters and resolutions from an era post 1945. It invokes history, morality and the collective will of nations. It sounds authoritative. It looks official. It insists it is law.
-
January 30, 2026
Pet project: What to do about furry friends in family court
Pets. Are the courts in a divorce action where both parties seek custody to treat them like children or property? The law in this area is all over the zoo. An Alberta judge, Douglas Mah, recently held in a case dealing with four cats that pets are to be treated like property, not kids. However, next door in B.C., the Family Law Act considers pets as family members, and the courts must determine who would best care for the pet.
-
January 30, 2026
Legal career reflections: Three things I wish I had known 50 years ago
In 1975 I was a young and enthusiastic teacher in a progressive middle school in rural eastern Ontario. By then I had aggressively completed my bachelor’s degree at night school and summer school, once knocking off five full courses in one calendar year, the same as if I had been a full-time student. I had written both the LSAT (law) and the GMAT (business) entrance tests with flattering scores, with dreams of a career either in law or management. At the same time, my then school principal was mentoring me to become a principal, giving me more responsibilities and coaching toward becoming qualified. The world, it seemed, was my oyster.
-
January 30, 2026
Ontario court orders new law licence review for man who admitted to sexually abusing children
Ontario’s top court has ordered a new law licence assessment for a man who admitted to the sexual abuse of children, saying a fresh look is required to determine whether he is of the “good character” required of a lawyer.
-
January 30, 2026
Court of Appeal rules that misapplication of Browne v. Dunn can derail defence
Every criminal defence counsel fears that a case may be lost on an evidentiary issue overlooked during trial. One such mistake would be to overlook in cross-examination what is known as the rule in Browne v. Dunn.