Law360 Canada ( August 15, 2019, 6:28 AM EDT) -- Appeal by the wife from a 2018 decision retroactively reducing the husband’s child support obligation pursuant to a 1996 child support order. The 1996 divorce judgment required the husband to pay child support of $115 per week per child, so long as the two daughters remained children of the marriage. By 2012, both daughters had completed post-secondary education and were employed. The husband fell into substantial arrears of child support. Although his taxable income was in decline from 1997 onwards, he did not commence a motion to change the order with respect to his child support obligations until 2016. As of the date of the motion to change, the arrears with interest amounted to more over $170,000. From 2001 to 2016, there were many years in which no support payments were made while the husband was out of the country. The motion judge determined that the husband was entitled as of right to a variation and a calculation of support based on table amounts and his drop in income from employment. Imputing income to him at minimum wage or at his actual earned income, and following the table amounts of the Guidelines, the motion judge recalculated the arrears and reduced them to $41,642....