Law360 Canada ( April 20, 2021, 6:23 AM EDT) -- Appeal by the plaintiff from summary trial judgment dismissing his action for damages for personal injuries suffered because of a slip and fall accident. The appellant fell on black ice on a municipal sidewalk adjacent to the respondents’ residential property. He claimed damages for negligence against the respondents pursuant to the Occupiers Liability Act. The chambers judge found that the respondents did not owe the appellant a duty of care. She concluded that the appellant failed to establish that a reasonable person in the position of the respondents should have foreseen that by attempting to clear the sidewalk of snow and ice they might be materially contributing to the risk of danger. The appellant argued the judge asked the wrong question about foreseeability, resulting in a failure to find that injury to the appellant was not the reasonably foreseeable consequence of careless removal of snow and ice and erred in finding there were significant policy reasons that would militate against the recognition of a duty of care....