Law360 Canada ( October 1, 2018, 9:14 AM EDT) -- Appeal by Paul from a decision of the Appeals Tribunal upholding the respondent’s decision to discontinue the appellant’s benefits on the basis that the appellant had consistently given low effort and had offered no objective evidence to challenge the occupational therapist’s findings after the functional capacity assessment. The appellant, a cleaner at a hotel, slipped at work in 2012 injuring her left shoulder, left arm, coccyx and buttocks. She argued she continued to suffer from ongoing back pain, chronic pain, chronic pain syndrome, fibromyalgia, anxiety and depression. In 2014, the appellant underwent a functional capacity assessment. Her physiotherapist predicted she was unlikely to be assessed as giving full effort on the evaluation. The appellant argued the Appeals Tribunal erred by equating low effort with obstruction and by inferring obstruction by low effort because she had not adduced objective evidence to the contrary....