Law360 Canada ( February 25, 2022, 11:51 AM EST) -- Appeal by Sebok from a judgment awarding Babits lump sum spousal support and special costs. Sebok claimed the trial judge erred in awarding spousal support to Babits when her post-separation income was higher than his, and for ignoring Babits’ own non-disclosure, lack of credibility and other misconduct in the award of special cost. The judge found Sebok did not have substantial post-separation income and was intentionally underemployed. He imputed income to Sebok, but of a relatively modest amount. As Babits was the primary caregiver of the parties’ children and was not able to pursue a career, he found she was entitled to compensatory support. The judge summarily dismissed Sebok’s application for special costs. Due to Sebok’s lack of disclosure and lack of credibility, the judge noted he was left with a great deal of uncertainty concerning Sebok’s financial circumstances and dealings both during the marriage and since the separation and awarded special costs to Babits....