Law360 Canada ( August 26, 2026, 9:44 AM EDT) -- Appeals by Pereira from orders striking her petition for judicial review, declaring her proceedings vexatious, and dismissing her application to disqualify the chambers judge, together with a review of an order dismissing her application for disclosure. Pereira’s employment with Horizon North Camp & Catering Inc. (Horizon North) was terminated. After her union settled grievances arising from her termination, Pereira filed complaints alleging the union breached its duty of fair representation. Those complaints and subsequent reconsideration applications were dismissed by the British Columbia Labour Relations Board (Board). Judicial review of the Board decisions was dismissed, as were subsequent appeals. Pereira filed a new petition seeking to quash the same Board decisions on the basis that they were obtained by fraud. She alleged that the Board member altered evidence, misrepresented her position, failed to refer to critical evidence, created facts, and improperly assumed the role of the union’s spokesperson. Horizon North applied to strike the new petition on the basis of res judicata and also sought an order declaring Pereira’s proceedings vexatious. The chambers judge disclosed his prior employment with the Attorney General of British Columbia (Attorney General), and his limited social relationship with counsel for the Attorney General. Pereira later applied to have the chambers judge disqualify himself, alleging actual bias and a reasonable apprehension of bias. On appeal, Pereira argued that the chambers judge’s work history, social relationships, conduct, and reasons demonstrated actual bias or a reasonable apprehension of bias. She also challenged the orders striking her petition, declaring her proceedings vexatious, and dismissing her disclosure application. Pereira further applied to adduce fresh evidence and the Attorney General sought to adduce responding fresh evidence....