Law360 Canada ( September 3, 2026, 9:43 AM EDT) -- Appeal by Fan from a judgment enforcing a written divorce settlement agreement respecting family property and debt. Fan and He cohabited for 10 years, married and divorced four times, and acquired a family home and business in British Columbia. Following their fourth divorce in China in June 2021, the parties executed a written Divorce Agreement allocating the British Columbia hotel business and its associated debt to He. Fan later refused to transfer control of the business and asserted that the Divorce Agreement was superseded by an oral settlement reached in October 2021. He maintained that the governing agreement remained the Divorce Agreement, while Fan also relied on a 2022 settlement agreement, which the trial judge set aside as unconscionable. The trial judge held that the Divorce Agreement governed the parties’ rights, vested the British Columbia company in He, and ordered an accounting of the parties’ claims and cross-claims. On appeal, Fan maintained that the judge erred in his interpretation of the Divorce Agreement, in finding that it was enforceable and not superseded by what he said was a settlement agreement made in 2021, and in the relief granted enforcing the Divorce Agreement....