 |
| Heidi J. T. Exner |
TradeOgre’s takedown was a swift and sweeping strike. On Sep. 21, the RCMP executed its largest-ever cryptocurrency seizure to date, targeting TradeOgre, a crypto platform that facilitated trades in traditional cryptocurrencies and numerous privacy coins. The action was framed as a crackdown against money laundering and illicit finance. Authorities claim TradeOgre routinely failed to meet Know-Your-Customer (KYC) and Anti-Money Laundering (AML) standards, operating in a regulatory grey zone that finally tipped into open law enforcement intervention.
Not only were TradeOgre’s operators arrested, but all of the platform’s user-wallets were frozen and
Vaselena: ISTOCKPHOTO.COM
Privacy coins: Legitimate tools or criminal’s choice?
Privacy coins, such as Monero and ZCash, are cryptocurrencies that are designed hide transaction details using advanced cryptography, thereby masking identities and transaction amounts from public ledgers. As these coins aim to bring cash-like anonymity into the digital world, naturally, they invite scrutiny from law enforcement for their potential in money laundering and sanction evasion utility. Yet, a one-dimensional view does a disservice to their legitimate use cases.
So what is the other side to these digital coins? Some argue that privacy coins enable dissidents and activists in authoritarian regimes to transact safely, shield ordinary citizens from the prying eyes of corporations, and uphold essential consumer and business confidentiality. For example, privacy technology is vital for journalists seeking to shield sources in hostile jurisdictions, small businesses protecting supplier agreements or individuals seeking to guard personal purchases from advertisers or identity thieves.
The TradeOgre case thus raises uneasy questions. When authorities seize a cryptocurrency platform’s assets in bulk, are legitimate users being sacrificed at the altar of financial crime prevention? Is it fair to treat privacy itself as a crime-adjacent trait?
It is unclear at this time what percentage of TradeOgre’s trading volume originated from legal activity from investors, importers, freelancers or privacy advocates leveraging the unique benefits of non-custodial privacy coins. What is clear is that many of these users awoke on Sept. 21 to discover their assets frozen. Their accounts, and thus livelihoods, were left in limbo, without due process, notice or individual assessment.
This blanket asset freeze effectively presumes guilt by association. The chilling message: “Because you used TradeOgre, you’re at best complicit.”
The regulatory imperative: Platforms must step up
Ultimately, TradeOgre’s fate is a cautionary tale about the failings of crypto platforms that refuse or neglect compliance. In today’s environment, “neutral” platforms are a myth. Ignoring, sidestepping or actively rebuffing FINTRAC compliance and basic KYC/AML protocols stand to put not only the business but every unwitting customer at existential risk.
What did TradeOgre do wrong? Beyond a lack of transparency and KYC, the platform often ignored Canadian legal demands, did little to engage with global best practices and dismissed multiple reputational warnings from watchdog organizations. The RCMP’s operation was, in many ways, an inevitable response to TradeOgre's stubborn defiance.
Risk leaders and compliance professionals in Canada must take note: the gold standard isn’t simply “not breaking the law.” It’s being able to demonstrate robust, documented processes for regulatory compliance, customer safety, and transparent governance. As I frequently state, organizations must embed integrity as a business principle — especially in globalized, fast-moving sectors like cryptocurrency.
Of course, none of this negates individual responsibility for those who engage with digital assets. The internet brims with platforms promising frictionless trading and idealistic notions of total “freedom,” yet few offer adequate education about the real-world risks of using platforms in legal limbo. Cold-storage wallets, reputation checks, user testimonials, and a review of compliance certifications are now mandatory steps for anyone serious about preserving their assets.
A due diligence checklist for the prudent crypto trader might include verifying platform regulatory registration and oversight, reviewing latest news or enforcement actions involving the platform and understanding the jurisdictional risks, especially if dealing in privacy coins.
Those who fail to take such measures risk losing far more than just money. They risk fundamental legal protections, including due process and property rights.
Lessons for regulators, platforms, and users
The TradeOgre takedown is a textbook case for risk professionals and traders alike. For authorities, it is cause for celebration — but perhaps it is also a reminder that the fight against financial crime can have unintended victims. For platforms, this is a fantastic a lesson in the steep price of sidestepping compliance. And for traders, it is a stern warning that convenience cannot trump due diligence or legal clarity.
Right now, thousands of Canadians are learning the hard way what it means to entrust digital assets to unregulated platforms. For privacy coin users, the presumption of guilt stings deeply. For regulators, balancing crime prevention with justice is more urgent — and complicated — than ever before.
In today’s global commercial environment, transparency, compliance and ethical governance are simply not optional. They are the bedrock for trust in financial services, whether digital or traditional. Without these pillars, the risk is not just financial loss, but a creeping erosion of the safety in the digital asset space itself.
Heidi J. T. Exner is an award-winning white-collar crime fighter and she is passionate about making the world a better place. Heidi is the founding partner of Ethical Edge PI & Corporate Advisors, the founder and chair of the Exner Foundation, and she serves on JURIST’s Alumni Board and the Policy & Advocacy Committee at the Canadian Blockchain Consortium. She welcomes you to find her on LinkedIn or check out her biography page on Ethical Edge’s website.
The opinions expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the author’s firm, its clients, Law360 Canada, LexisNexis Canada or any of its or their respective affiliates. This article is for general information purposes and is not intended to be and should not be taken as legal advice.
Interested in writing for us? To learn more about how you can add your voice to Law360 Canada, contact Analysis Editor Peter Carter at peter.carter@lexisnexis.ca or call 647-776-6740.