Nationwide Need Not Cover Marker Makers' Trade Secret Fight

By Gianna Ferrarin · March 30, 2026, 3:30 PM EDT

Four Nationwide units have no duty to defend a marker manufacturer in an underlying suit by a competitor alleging it colluded with former employees to use trade secrets and other proprietary...

To view the full article, register now.

Try a seven day FREE Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Documents

Memorandum

Case Information

Case Title

ARRO-MARK CO. LLC v. WARREN et al

Case Number

Court

New Jersey

Nature of Suit

Defend Trade Secrets Act (of 2016)

Date Filed

November 17, 2022

Case Title

Harleysville Insurance Company et al v. SKM Industries, Inc. et al

Case Number

Court

Pennsylvania Middle

Nature of Suit

Insurance

Date Filed

June 12, 2023

Recent Articles By Gianna

March 27, 2026
Berkshire Hathaway Unit Must Face Suit Over $3M Verdict
March 26, 2026
Insurer's Fake-Adjuster Suit Is Time-Barred, Court Says
March 25, 2026
Atty Loses Coverage For Wife's Employer Trade Secret Suit
March 25, 2026
Insurer Need Not Cover Parkinson's Drug Antitrust Dispute
March 24, 2026
Gulf Reinsurance Plan Could Help China, Lawmaker Says
March 23, 2026
Health Insurers Can't Force Conn. ERISA Row Into Arbitration
March 18, 2026
Norfolk Southern Secures Insurer Defense Over Worker Death
March 17, 2026
Progressive Shooting Coverage Suit Clears Dismissal Bid
March 17, 2026
Geico Keeps RICO, Fraud Claims In NY No-Fault Billing Suit
March 13, 2026
AIG Policy Excludes $150M Pollution Coverage, 7th Circ. Finds