In an open letter to Prime Minister Mark Carney, Smith also said Ottawa needs to relax bilingualism requirements for judicial appointments “that do not reflect Canada’s broader linguistic diversity in Western Canada and alienates Albertans and western Canadians alike.”
“We are simply asking for a formal and meaningful role in the judicial appointment process that would boost public confidence in the administration of justice, support national unity within Alberta, and ensure judicial decision-making reflects the values and expectations of Albertans,” she said in a statement.
Alberta Premier Danielle Smith
“For the three of nine seats reserved for Quebec on the Supreme Court of Canada, a specific board is formed that includes two members appointed by the federal government and two appointed by Quebec,” he said.
Amery said Alberta has proposed a special advisory committee be put in place for the province, consisting of four non-partisan experts from Alberta and the federal government.
“The highest levels of Alberta’s justice system should reflect Albertans, and allowing their input and the appointment of justices that reflect the wide spectrum of Albertan identity would enhance trust in Canada’s legal precepts,” he said.
University of Alberta law professor Gerard Kennedy said Smith’s request for a greater say was a “reasonable ask,” but it was up to the federal government whether they want to grant it.
“There’s nothing unusual with suggesting a province should have a larger role in the process — it was actually a significant bone of contention during the Meech Lake and Charlottetown Accord negotiations,” he said.
Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada Sean Fraser
“We’ve got independent judicial advisory committees with appointees that factor in feedback from the provinces. We’ve got representatives of the law societies, of the Canadian Bar Association, of the federal government who are able to make independent recommendations,” he said. “Those are fed into our process.”
Canada needs to adhere to the boundaries of the Constitution, said Fraser, including the need to protect the independence of the judiciary.
“These are values that we have taken for granted for many years as Canadians, but as examples around the world have showcased, nowhere is safe from democratic backsliding, and if we’re going to have a functioning democracy, an independent judiciary is a key part of it,” he said.
Kennedy said the current judicial appointment committees in Canada do have representatives appointed by provincial governments but also noted — as recognized by Amery — the process for Supreme Court vacancies in Quebec is different. He also said refusing to provide support for new justices would likely be constitutional — but whether that is a good idea from an administrative and access-to-justice perspective is another question.
“Under the constitutional order, the federal government has the power to appoint judges to the superior courts and courts of appeal, but the province has the jurisdiction over the administration of justice,” he said. “So, it was very challenging for the federal government to create a new judicial position in the absence of the provincial government providing support for it.”
If you have any information, story ideas or news tips for Law360 Canada, please contact Ian Burns at Ian.Burns@lexisnexis.ca or call 905-415-5906.